New Developments in the Case of Fadel Shaker: Is the Trial Approaching Judicial Resolution?

The trial of Lebanese artist Fadel Shaker has entered a new phase following the decision of the presiding judge, Bilal Dhanawi, to postpone the session to April 24, in order to hear the closing arguments in the case related to charges of incitement to murder, financing terrorism, and possession of illegal weapons.
These developments come amid widespread anticipation regarding the fate of the case, which has occupied Lebanese public opinion for years.

Talk of Possible Judicial Settlement

Local media reports have indicated increasing speculation about the possibility of reaching a judicial settlement that could end the file, especially after the plaintiff, Hilal Hamoud, appeared before the court for the first time.
During his testimony, Hamoud accused the Lebanese artist of inciting his murder during the events in Sidon, noting that his role – according to his statement – was limited to incitement through loudspeakers inside Bilal bin Rabah Mosque, without confirming a direct sighting of Shaker at the scene of the clashes.

Shaker Rejects the Charges and Describes Them as Fabricated

Fadel Shaker responded to these accusations inside the courtroom, objecting to what he considered contradictions in the plaintiff's statements, asserting that the charges against him are "fabricated and constructed."
After the session concluded, Shaker spoke to the media, emphasizing that his goal in appearing before the judiciary is to prove his complete innocence, not to seek any legal settlement, considering that the case carries political dimensions that go beyond the judicial aspect.

Legal Developments That May Strengthen Shaker's Position

Previous legal reports had indicated judicial recommendations to drop several charges against the Lebanese artist, including financing terrorism, insulting a brotherly state, and money laundering, which could affect the course of the final ruling in the case.

Dropping the Personal Lawsuit Changes the Course of the Case

Legal experts believe that the plaintiff Hilal Hamoud's dropping of his personal lawsuit represents an important turning point in the judicial file, noting that Shaker's self-defense strength may enhance his position during the upcoming phase of the trial.