The British Home Office announced yesterday, Friday, that it has filed an appeal against a court ruling issued by the High Court, which mandated a hotel in Epping, north of London, to temporarily stop receiving asylum seekers, following anti-immigration protests that erupted in the area since last July.
According to the court ruling, migrants residing in the hotel were given until September 12 to leave, which sparked widespread controversy and increasing concern within government circles.
This ruling sets a legal precedent, making it likely to be used as a reference in similar lawsuits in other parts of the country, which could hinder the government's efforts to address the asylum seekers' situation, especially with the existing legal obligation to provide temporary housing for them while their applications are being processed.
In the first official reaction, Minister of State for Security Dan Jarvis confirmed that the government would appeal the ruling, stating: "We are committed to ending the use of hotels to house asylum seekers, but it must be done in an organized and considered manner," emphasizing that the appeal is aimed at maintaining a balance between implementing new policies and respecting legal obligations towards asylum seekers.
Previous Conservative Party governments had widely relied on hotels as temporary housing for migrants, a policy that the Labour Party, led by Prime Minister Keir Starmer, described as "expensive and ineffective," pledging to end it completely by 2029, as part of its approach to tighten immigration policies and rationalize public spending.
Despite these promises, figures indicate a significant increase in the number of migrants, with more than 50,000 people arriving on British shores in small boats since Starmer took office as Prime Minister.
Additionally, 111,084 asylum applications were submitted between June 2024 and June 2025, an annual increase of 14%, the highest number recorded in a single year since data collection began in 2001.
This legal and political escalation comes at a time when Britain is witnessing a heated debate over immigration and asylum policies, amid internal and external pressures to find sustainable and humane solutions that align with international treaties and the complex local reality.